Clarity - December 24, 2006
CLARITY
What makes the precise detail of certain musician’s improvisations “clear”? When every aspect seems just right - when every note and rythmic choice made seems “perfect”. This is improvisation. It’s not supposed to be perfect some may say and to an extent they are right.
This concept came up for discussion one afternoon while playing with John Abercrombie at his home. We were discussing the various ways to approach a tune and the idea of what/how to approach soloing on a song (whether an original or a standard) and I felt this important concept certainly come to light and worth talking about.
Certain musician immediately comes to mind in terms of clarity in what they play and how they play it. Is it a conscious choice? Miles, Jim Hall, Chet Baker, Wynton Kelly, Bill Evans all evoke this certain kind of purity to their playing. If the melody of a song is viewed as the highest statement of “truth” if viewed as an improvisation, these musicians’ improvisations often times stand as an even higher pinnacle of perfection. How can one aspire toward the goal of a clear, concise, perfect statement melodically, rhythmically, and harmonically? John indicated if you really listen to a tune you want to approach learning/performing - really listen - to it’s melody, form, harmony, tempo etc. etc. - the song itself will actually dictate the path to take when approaching improvising a solo. Learn the melody and general structure/feel of particular piece music and then let that essence be the “goal” at which you attain this clarity. Without becoming too abstract I think that awareness of that idea, combined with a deep commitment to “swing” (in all aspects) during this process certainly helps. It must, as the aforementioned player’s always speak so clearly in what they play and it always feels good as well.
Form – Another point worth exploring when constructing a solo is to never lose site of form as a tool in this regard. Is it a traditional AABA standard or perhaps a repeated short form cycle such as Horace Silver’s “Peace” or “Blue and Green”? Each connotes a different approach to playing and one must really take that into consideration when deciding what, when, and how to improvise. Again, awareness is key.
Intensity – The concept of intensity also comes to mind when opening the door to achieving clarity. It’s often misunderstood and misinterpreted. Instead of the obvious idea of louder, faster etc. an approach I love is so clearly demonstrated in the playing of Jim Hall. Jim chooses a total harmonic approach to intensity that defies the conventional idea of playing more notes or simply boosting volume levels. He’ll alter chordal shapes and introduce subtle reharmonizations at low volumes that truly “roar” with intensity. A seeming paradox that makes perfect sense and the result is total clarity in his improvisations and a real sense of purpose.
Finally, just as an aside, lately, when I hear any of the great jazz masters who we associate sometimes with a particular instrument, play, it’s interesting that their actual instrument becomes so secondary to what they play. In other words I’m less and less aware of Jim actually playing a guitar per se or Paul Desmond “playing” a saxophone. The clarity and their total commitment to playing in the moment transcends the technique of any one instruments technical challenges. For the purposes of clarity the instrument truly is just a vehicle. The improvisation and “point of view” if you will, is so up front, simple and clear, that the technical demands of any one instrument seem to not even enter the equation. Just a few recent thoughts to strive for...
What makes the precise detail of certain musician’s improvisations “clear”? When every aspect seems just right - when every note and rythmic choice made seems “perfect”. This is improvisation. It’s not supposed to be perfect some may say and to an extent they are right.
This concept came up for discussion one afternoon while playing with John Abercrombie at his home. We were discussing the various ways to approach a tune and the idea of what/how to approach soloing on a song (whether an original or a standard) and I felt this important concept certainly come to light and worth talking about.
Certain musician immediately comes to mind in terms of clarity in what they play and how they play it. Is it a conscious choice? Miles, Jim Hall, Chet Baker, Wynton Kelly, Bill Evans all evoke this certain kind of purity to their playing. If the melody of a song is viewed as the highest statement of “truth” if viewed as an improvisation, these musicians’ improvisations often times stand as an even higher pinnacle of perfection. How can one aspire toward the goal of a clear, concise, perfect statement melodically, rhythmically, and harmonically? John indicated if you really listen to a tune you want to approach learning/performing - really listen - to it’s melody, form, harmony, tempo etc. etc. - the song itself will actually dictate the path to take when approaching improvising a solo. Learn the melody and general structure/feel of particular piece music and then let that essence be the “goal” at which you attain this clarity. Without becoming too abstract I think that awareness of that idea, combined with a deep commitment to “swing” (in all aspects) during this process certainly helps. It must, as the aforementioned player’s always speak so clearly in what they play and it always feels good as well.
Form – Another point worth exploring when constructing a solo is to never lose site of form as a tool in this regard. Is it a traditional AABA standard or perhaps a repeated short form cycle such as Horace Silver’s “Peace” or “Blue and Green”? Each connotes a different approach to playing and one must really take that into consideration when deciding what, when, and how to improvise. Again, awareness is key.
Intensity – The concept of intensity also comes to mind when opening the door to achieving clarity. It’s often misunderstood and misinterpreted. Instead of the obvious idea of louder, faster etc. an approach I love is so clearly demonstrated in the playing of Jim Hall. Jim chooses a total harmonic approach to intensity that defies the conventional idea of playing more notes or simply boosting volume levels. He’ll alter chordal shapes and introduce subtle reharmonizations at low volumes that truly “roar” with intensity. A seeming paradox that makes perfect sense and the result is total clarity in his improvisations and a real sense of purpose.
Finally, just as an aside, lately, when I hear any of the great jazz masters who we associate sometimes with a particular instrument, play, it’s interesting that their actual instrument becomes so secondary to what they play. In other words I’m less and less aware of Jim actually playing a guitar per se or Paul Desmond “playing” a saxophone. The clarity and their total commitment to playing in the moment transcends the technique of any one instruments technical challenges. For the purposes of clarity the instrument truly is just a vehicle. The improvisation and “point of view” if you will, is so up front, simple and clear, that the technical demands of any one instrument seem to not even enter the equation. Just a few recent thoughts to strive for...